The Links
get liberaloasis
get bill scher
get truth
get blogged a-c
get group blogged
get local blogged
get beltway blogged
get congress blogged
get econ blogged
get multimedia blogged
get green blogged
get blogged d-l
who needs drudge
get labor blogged
get law blogged
get science blogged
get health blogged
get feminist blogged
get immigration blogged
get big shot blogged
get liberal
get left
get blogged m-r
get for. policy blogged
get iraq blogged
get iran blogged
get israel blogged
get arab blogged
get god
get godless
get church & state
get religious right
get cults
get blogged s-z
get canadian blogged
get country blogged
get expat blogged
get blogged 0-9
get investigative
get inside the system
get media analysis
get radio blogged
get polls
get framed
get literary blogged
get mom blogged
get dad blogged
get libertarian
get moderate
get both sides
get it all
the blog

Tuesday Oct 3, 2006

Is Denny Done?

The right-wing Washington Times is calling for Speaker Dennis Hastert's resignation for failing to properly investigate then-Rep. Mark Foley.

This does not appear to be a consensus strategy among Beltway conservatives. The National Review is defending Hastert. The White House tried (clumsily) to downplay the scandal instead of feeding the public outrage.

It's possible that the Republlican Party may come around to the W. Times' thinking. When leaders cease to be of use to them, they readily throw them under the bus.

When Newt Gingrich contributed to a loss of House seats in '98, he was forced out. And Trent Lott's segregationist fantasies weren't worth defending.

Whereas the GOP defended Tom DeLay for months, because his ability to bring in corporate cash was seen as essential to the party's long-term prospects.

The low-key Hastert is no DeLay. He may be seen as replaceable.

(Although, Republican leaders may be concerned the other potential Speakers would do a worse job maintaining party discipline.)

A quick disposal of Hastert may suck the oxygen out of the story, as he's the biggest (though not only) scalp to get.

The Washington Times is clearly betting that's the best way to get the scandal off the front pages well in advance of Election Day.

But a fight among Republicans over the welfare of Hastert is probably the last thing they would want, because that gives the story more oxygen.

Thanks to the Washington Times upping the ante, Republicans have to think fast: is Hastert worth it?

Posted by Bill Scher on Oct 3, 2006 email post email Spotlight / / You are in Republican Party
Posts Near Oct 3, 2006