The Links
get liberaloasis
get bill scher
get truth
get blogged a-c
get group blogged
get local blogged
get beltway blogged
get congress blogged
get econ blogged
get multimedia blogged
get green blogged
get blogged d-l
who needs drudge
get labor blogged
get law blogged
get science blogged
get health blogged
get feminist blogged
get immigration blogged
get big shot blogged
get liberal
get left
get blogged m-r
get for. policy blogged
get iraq blogged
get iran blogged
get israel blogged
get arab blogged
get god
get godless
get church & state
get religious right
get cults
get blogged s-z
get canadian blogged
get country blogged
get expat blogged
get blogged 0-9
get investigative
get inside the system
get media analysis
get radio blogged
get polls
get framed
get literary blogged
get mom blogged
get dad blogged
get libertarian
get moderate
get both sides
get it all
the blog

Monday Jan 29, 2007

Clinton on Iran

LiberalOasis has previously expressed wariness about Sen. Hillary Clinton's foreign policy objectives, as she has left open the possibility of permanent bases in Iraq.

But today on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360, when asked about possible military action in Iran, she was properly skeptical -- pushing back on White House framing of the rhetoric.

First, when asked about crafting a strategy to stabilize Iraq, she said we needed a "comprehensive strategy" that included:

...an international process that looks at how to prevent what's happening in Iraq from spilling over.

That means not only bringing the countries together that we already have relations with ... but it means being engaged with countries that our president will not engage with.

I don't understand this philosophy that you don't talk to bad guys. We talked to the Soviet Union all during the Cold War.

I think you have to engage with people who are your enemies or your potential adversaries in order to figure out what's on their mind.

Then, Cooper asked for her reaction to Dubya's saber-rattling with Iran earlier this morning. She responded:

CLINTON: We're playing a very dangerous game of Chicken here.

For domestic political consumption, the Iranians believe that they can continue to be belligerent and make outrageous claims against Israel [and] the United States, interfere with what's going on in Iraq.

We're standing back here, threatening and pointing fingers. And I think we're hearing a lot of the same rhetoric we heard before the president's decision to launch a pre-emptive war in Iraq.

COOPER: Do you think this president is preparing the ground for some sort of military action against Iran?

CLINTON: I don't know. I don't know. I think that we in the Congress are going to have a lot of questions about that.

LiberalOasis would quibble that Clinton should not say "the Iranians" are monolithically "belligerent," when the belligerent President Ahmadinejad just had his wings clipped by the public and by the Supreme Leader.

Still. Clinton did the helpful thing by challenging Administration credibility and questioning the rationale for expanding the war.

This doesn't get her off the hook for her earlier statement on permanent bases. She should clarify her views and make clear when her vision for the region is.

Still, her Iran comments should be factored in as we try to discern the Iran policies and the foreign policy visions of all the prospective nominees.

Posted by Bill Scher on Jan 29, 2007 email post email Spotlight / / You are in Democratic Party/ Foreign Policy/ Iran
Posts Near Jan 29, 2007
Jan 29, 2007Air America This Morning

Jan 30, 2007Crippling The Civil Service