The Links
get liberaloasis
get bill scher
get truth
get blogged a-c
get group blogged
get local blogged
get beltway blogged
get congress blogged
get econ blogged
get multimedia blogged
get green blogged
get blogged d-l
who needs drudge
get labor blogged
get law blogged
get science blogged
get health blogged
get feminist blogged
get immigration blogged
get big shot blogged
get liberal
get left
get blogged m-r
get for. policy blogged
get iraq blogged
get iran blogged
get israel blogged
get arab blogged
get god
get godless
get church & state
get religious right
get cults
get blogged s-z
get canadian blogged
get country blogged
get expat blogged
get blogged 0-9
get investigative
get inside the system
get media analysis
get radio blogged
get polls
get framed
get literary blogged
get mom blogged
get dad blogged
get libertarian
get moderate
get both sides
get it all
the blog

Tuesday Jun 26, 2007

Lugar Calls For "Sustainable Military Posture" In Iraq

That's not the headline Senate Foreign Policy Cmte Ranking Member Richard Lugar is getting today. He's getting ink for saying the current "surge" strategy isn't working and calling for a troop reduction.

But before you put Lugar on a pedestal, recognize that he also said, "A total withdrawal from Iraq also fails to meet our security interests."

And here's what he means by a "course change" in Iraq:

Shifting to a Sustainable Military Posture

Our security interests call for a downsizing and re-deployment of U.S. military forces to more sustainable positions in Iraq or the Middle East. Numerous locations for temporary or permanent military bases have been suggested, including Kuwait or other nearby states, the Kurdish territories, or defensible locations in Iraq outside of urban areas. All of these options come with problems and limitations. But some level of American military presence in Iraq would improve the odds that we could respond to terrorist threats, protect oil flows, and help deter a regional war.

So he wants a reduced but "sustainable" military presence, in part to "protect oil flows," involving "temporary or permanent military bases" (Call' em want you want! We're staying!).

Lugar should not be allowed to define the opposite pole of the Iraq debate.

The Lugar-Bush debate is "how many troops should we use to occupy Iraq?"

The fundamental debate is "should we permanently occupy Iraq or not?"

Posted by Bill Scher on Jun 26, 2007 email post email Spotlight / / You are in Iraq
Posts Near Jun 26, 2007