The Links
get liberaloasis
get bill scher
get truth
get blogged a-c
get group blogged
get local blogged
get beltway blogged
get congress blogged
get econ blogged
get multimedia blogged
get green blogged
get blogged d-l
who needs drudge
get labor blogged
get law blogged
get science blogged
get health blogged
get feminist blogged
get immigration blogged
get big shot blogged
get liberal
get left
get blogged m-r
get for. policy blogged
get iraq blogged
get iran blogged
get israel blogged
get arab blogged
get god
get godless
get church & state
get religious right
get cults
get blogged s-z
get canadian blogged
get country blogged
get expat blogged
get blogged 0-9
get investigative
get inside the system
get media analysis
get radio blogged
get polls
get framed
get literary blogged
get mom blogged
get dad blogged
get libertarian
get moderate
get both sides
get it all
the blog

Sunday Jul 22, 2007

How Did That Safe Haven Get There?

With the latest National Intelligence Estimate finding that Al Qaeda "has protected or regenerated key elements of its Homeland attack capability," the White House took to the Sunday shows to fight the obvious conclusion that Dubya's neocon foreign policy has utterly failed.

Their talking point? Pakistan screwed up and let Al Qaeda establish a "safe haven."

Here's White House Homeland Security Adviser Fran Townsend on Fox News Sunday:

They've been able to take advantage of the agreement between President Musharraf and the tribal elders in the federally administrated tribal area to find safe haven, to train, to recruit.

And here's Director of National Intelligene Mike McConnell on Meet The Press, responding to a question how could last year's intelligence estimate say Al Qaeda was "seriously damaged":

...what happened? What’s different? What changed?

In Pakistan, where they're enjoying a safe haven, the government of Pakistan chose to try a political solution. The political solution meant a peace treaty with a region that's never been governed -- not governed from the outside, not governed by Pakistan.

The opposite occurred. Instead of pushing al-Qaeda out, the people who live in these federally- administered tribal areas, rather than pushing al-Qaeda out, they made a safe haven for training and recruiting. And so, in that period of time, al-Qaeda has been able to regain some of its momentum.

Who would be stupid enough to get behind a peace agreement with militants tied to Al Qaeda?

George W. Bush, of course.

Townsend and McConnell somehow forgot to mention that peace agreement was "encouraged" by the White House, and publicly endorsed by Dubya -- as noted by LiberalOasis recently.

(And Fox News Sunday and Meet The Press neglected to bring it up as well.)

The Bush Administration did not prioritize going after the actual terrorist threat, instead choosing to pursue a permanent occupation of Iraq as a policy goal, whihc has created more terrorists.

While the Bush Administration is trying to use this safe haven to shift blame to Pakistan, the fact is the safe haven is the direct result of a policy that the Bush Administration is directly complict in crafting.

Once again, the failure is their own.

Posted by Bill Scher on Jul 22, 2007 email post email Spotlight / / You are in Foreign Policy/ Pakistan/ Terrorism
Posts Near Jul 22, 2007