The Links
get liberaloasis
get bill scher
get truth
get blogged a-c
get group blogged
get local blogged
get beltway blogged
get congress blogged
get econ blogged
get multimedia blogged
get green blogged
get blogged d-l
who needs drudge
get labor blogged
get law blogged
get science blogged
get health blogged
get feminist blogged
get immigration blogged
get big shot blogged
get liberal
get left
get blogged m-r
get for. policy blogged
get iraq blogged
get iran blogged
get israel blogged
get arab blogged
get god
get godless
get church & state
get religious right
get cults
get blogged s-z
get canadian blogged
get country blogged
get expat blogged
get blogged 0-9
get investigative
get inside the system
get media analysis
get radio blogged
get polls
get framed
get literary blogged
get mom blogged
get dad blogged
get libertarian
get moderate
get both sides
get it all
the blog

Wednesday Jul 18, 2007

The Reality of Anbar

On TomDispatch, Kurdish advisor Peter Galbraith gives an stark assessment of the state of the surge, en route to making a case for shifting US troops to the Kurdish region, in part to "preserv[e] Kurdistan democracy."

While over on American Footprints, Eric Martin argues that keeping troops in the Kurdish region would have plenty of destabilizing effects.

LiberalOasis generally sides with Martin's argument (the Center for American Progress proposal appears acceptable, maintaining a Kurdish presence, but only until 2009, not for an indefinite and destabilzing occupation.)

But Galbraith's assessment of Iraq is an essential read, as it is an antidote to the distortions from the surge advocates.

In particular, Galbraith echoes and elaborates on Sen. Jim Webb's rejection of the surge-ites main argument: that the surge has turned the Iraqi people against Al Qaeda in the Anbar province.

Webb said on Meet The Press Sunday:

...the people in al-Anbar are not aligning themselves with the United States. It's "The enemy of the enemy is my friend."

This hasn't been the Iraqi military, the national military that's been taking out al-Qaeda. It's been a redneck justice. It's been these sectarian groups out there who don't like al-Qaeda. And if we leave, they still will not like al-Qaeda.

Galbraith adds more detail, and paints an even more disturbing picture:

The developments in Anbar are more significant. Tribesmen who had been attacking U.S. troops in support of the insurgency are now taking U.S. weapons to fight al-Qaeda and other Sunni extremists. Unfortunately, the Sunni fundamentalists are not the only enemy of these new U.S.-sponsored militias. The Sunni tribes also regard Iraq's Shiite-led government as an enemy, and the U.S. appears now to be in the business of arming both the Sunni and Shiite factions in what has long since become a civil war.

The surge was supposed to create the condidtions that would bring reconciliation between Iraqi factions. Instead, it's directly contributing to conditions for a more bloody civil war.

Much like how invading Iraq was supposed to weaken Al Qaeda, and instead has strengthened Al Qaeda.

Posted by Bill Scher on Jul 18, 2007 email post email Spotlight / / You are in Iraq
Posts Near Jul 18, 2007
Jul 16, 2007Painting The Big Picture

Jul 21, 2007Errington Thompson Show