The Links
get liberaloasis
get bill scher
get truth
get blogged a-c
get group blogged
get local blogged
get beltway blogged
get congress blogged
get econ blogged
get multimedia blogged
get green blogged
get blogged d-l
who needs drudge
get labor blogged
get law blogged
get science blogged
get health blogged
get feminist blogged
get immigration blogged
get big shot blogged
get liberal
get left
get blogged m-r
get for. policy blogged
get iraq blogged
get iran blogged
get israel blogged
get arab blogged
get god
get godless
get church & state
get religious right
get cults
get blogged s-z
get canadian blogged
get country blogged
get expat blogged
get blogged 0-9
get investigative
get inside the system
get media analysis
get radio blogged
get polls
get framed
get literary blogged
get mom blogged
get dad blogged
get libertarian
get moderate
get both sides
get it all
the blog

Wednesday May 7, 2008

Principle Beats Pander

While every expert said the temporary gas tax cut was terrible policy, pretty much every pundit said it was great politics, showing Clinton knew how to connect with voters better than Obama.

Wrong.

After Clinton grasped for the pander move, Obama saw an opening.

Draw a stark contrast between their approaches to politics, move media focus to a substantive policy conflict and burnish the overriding message on which his campaign has long been based.

There wasn't much outward bluster. But it took much inner toughness to plant that flag and stick with it.

The result: a big 15-point victory in North Carolina, and thin 2-point loss in Indiana (with Operation Chaos perhaps illegitimately creating Clinton's margin of victory).

Both results strongly outperformed most of the recent polling.

Notably, Obama triumphed in the exit polls on the question of who is "honest and trustworthy." 49% in NC and 45% in IN said Clinton was not honest. Only 27% and 30% respectively said the same of Obama.

He not only won the most votes and delegates yesterday, he won them in the right way -- in a way that bolsters his message, forges trust and helps build a governing mandate.

Clinton sought to undermine him not simply with a pander move, but with continued borrowing of right-wing frames and arguments (obliterating Iran, deriding expert policy recommendations, mocking fellow Dems as "elitist.") You can't build a governing mandate that way.

But that's a moot point, because she lost the argument and the night. And in all likelihood, the nomination.

Posted by Bill Scher on May 7, 2008 email post email Spotlight / / You are in Democratic Party
Posts Near May 7, 2008